The Neurophysiological Bases of Auditory Perception

the marmoset inferior colliculus: neural correlates of perceptual "pop out".PAUL NELSON, ERIC YOUNG16.Auditory temporal integration at threshold: Evidence of a cortical origin.BERND LÜTKENHÖNERPart IVPitch and Timbre17.Spatiotemporal characteristics of cortical responses to a new dichotic pitch stimulus.CAROLINE WITTON, ARJAN HILLEBRAND, G. BRUCE HENNING18.A temporal code for Huggins pitch?CHRISTOPHER J. PLACK, SUZANNE FITZPATRICK, ROBERT P. CARLYON, HEDWIG E. GOCKEL19.Understanding pitch perception as a hierarchical process with top-down modulation.EMILI BALAGUER-BALLESTER, NICHOLAS R. CLARK, MARTIN COATH, KATRIN KRUMBHOLZ, SUSAN DENHAM20.The Harmonic Organization of Auditory Cortex.XIAOQIN WANG21.Reviewing the definition of timbre as it pertains to the perception of speech and musical sounds.ROY D. PATTERSON, THOMAS C. WALTERS, JESSICA J. M. MONAGHAN, ETIENNE GAUDRAIN22.Size Perception for acoustically scaled sounds of naturally pronounced and whispered words.TOSHIO IRINO, YOSHIE AOKI, HIDEKI KAWAHARA, ROY D. PATTERSONPart VBinaural hearing23.Subcomponent cues in binaural unmasking.JOHN CULLING24.Interaural correlations between +1 and -1 on a Thurstone scale: psychometric functions and a two-parameter model.HELGE LÜDDEMANN, HELMUT RIEDEL, ANDRE RUPP25.Dynamic ITDs, not ILDs, underlie binaural detection of a tone in wideband noise.MARCEL VAN DER HEIJDEN, PHILIP X. JORIS26.Effect of reverberation on directional sensitivity of auditory neurons: Central and peripheral factors.SASHA DEVORE, ANDREW SCHWARTZ, BERTRAND DELGUTTE27.New experiments employing raised-sine stimuli suggest an unknown factor affects sensitivity to envelope-based ITDs for stimuli having low depths of modulation.LESLIE R. BERNSTEIN, CONSTANTINE TRAHIOTIS28.Modeling Physiological and Psychophysical Responses to Precedence Effect Stimuli.JING XIA, ANDREW BRUGHERA, H. STEVEN COLBURN, BARBARA SHINN-CUNNINGHAM29.Binaurally-coherent jitter improves neural and perceptual ITD sensitivity in normal and electric hearing.M. GOUPELL, K. HANCOCK, P. MAJDAK, B. LABACK, B. DELGUTTE30.Lateralization of tone complexes in noise: the role of monaural envelope processing in binaural hearing.STEVEN VAN DE PAR, ARMIN KOHLRAUSCH, NICOLAS LE GOFF31.Adjustment of interaural-time-difference analysis to sound level.IDA SIVEKE, CHRISTIAN LEIBOLD, KATHARINA KAISER, BENEDIKT GROTHE, LUTZ WIEGREBE32.The role of envelope wave form, adaptation, and attacks in binaural perception.STEPHAN D. EWERT, MATHIAS DIETZ, MARTIN KLEIN-HENNIG, VOLKER HOHMANN33.Short-term synaptic plasticity and adaptation contribute to the coding of timing and intensity information.KATRINA MACLEOD, GO ASHIDA, CHRIS GLAZE AND CATHERINE CARR34.Adaptive coding for auditory spatial cues.PHILLIPP HEHRMANN, JULIA MAIER, NICOL HARPER, DAVID MCALPINE, MANEESH SAHANI35.Phase shifts in monaural field potentials of the medial superior olive.MYLES MC LAUGHLIN, MARCEL VAN DER HEIJDEN, PHILIP X. JORISPart VISpeech Processing and Perception36.Representation of intelligible and distorted speech in human auditory cortex.STEFAN UPPENKAMP, HAGEN WIERSTORF37.Intelligibility of time-compressed speech with periodic and aperiodic insertions of silence: Evidence for endogenous brain rhythms in speech perception?ODED GHITZA, STEVEN GREENBERG38.The representation of the pitch of vowel sounds in ferret auditory cortex.JAN SCHNUPP, ANDREW KING, KERRY WALKER, JENNIFER BIZLEY39.Macroscopic and microscopic analysis of speech recognition in noise: What can be understood at which level?THOMAS BRAND, TIM JÜRGENS, RAINER BEUTELMANN, RALPH M. MEYER, BIRGER KOLLMEIER40.Effects of peripheral tuning on the auditory nerve's representation of speech envelope and temporal fine structure cues.RASHA A. IBRAHIM, IAN C. BRUCE41.Room reflections and constancy in speech-like sounds: Within-band effects.A. J. WATKINS, A. RAIMOND, S. J. MAKIN42.Identification of perceptual cues for consonant sounds and the influence of sensorineural hearing loss on speech perception.FEIPENG LI, JONT B. ALLENPart VIIAuditory Scene Analysis43.A comparative view on the perception of mistuning: constraints of the auditory periphery.ASTRID KLINGE, NAOYA ITATANI, GEORG M. KLUMP44.Stability of perceptual organisation in auditory streaming.SUSAN L. DENHAM, KINGA GYIMESI, GÁBOR STEFANICS, ISTVÁN WINKLER45.Sequential and simultaneous auditory grouping measured with synchrony detection.CHRISTOPHE MICHEYL, SHIHAB SHAMMA, MOUNYA ELHILALI, ANDREW J. OXENHAM46.Rate vs. temporal code? A spatio-temporal coherence model of the cortical basis of streaming.MOUNYA ELHILALI, LING MA, CHRISTOPHE MICHEYL, ANDREW J. OXENHAM, SHIHAB A. SHAMMA47.Objective measures of Auditory Scene Analysis.ROBERT P. CARLYON, SARAH K. THOMPSON, ANTJE HEINRICH, FRIEDEMANN PULVERMULLER, MATTHEW H. DAVIS, YURY SHTYROV, RHODRI CUSACK, INGRID S. JOHNSRUDE48.Perception of concurrent sentences with harmonic or frequency-shifted voiced excitation: Performance of human listeners and of computational models based on autocorrelation.BRIAN ROBERTS, STEPHEN D. HOLMES, CHRISTOPHER J. DARWIN, GUY J. BROWNPart VIIINovelty detection, Attention and Learning49.Is there stimulus-specific adaptation in the medial geniculate body of the rat?FLORA ANTUNES, ELLEN COVEY, MANUEL S. MALMIERCA50.Auditory streaming at the cocktail party: Simultaneous neural and behavioral studies of auditory attention.MOUNYA ELHILALI, JUANJUAN XIANG, SHIHAB A. SHAMMA, JONATHAN Z. SIMON51.Correlates of auditory attention and task performance in primary auditory and prefrontal cortex.SHIHAB SHAMMA, JONATHAN FRITZ, STEPHEN DAVID, MOUNYA ELHILALI, DANIEL WINKOWSKI, PINGBO YIN52.The implicit learning of noise: Behavioural data and computational models.TREVOR R. AGUS, MARION BEAUVAIS, SIMON J. THORPE, DANIEL PRESSNITZER53.Role of primary auditory cortex in acoustic orientation and approach-to-target responses.FERNANDO R. NODAL, VICTORIA M. BAJO, ANDREW J. KINGPart IXHearing impairment54.Objective and behavioral estimates of cochlear response times innormal-hearing and hearing-impaired human listeners.OLAF STRELCYK, TORSTEN DAU55.Why do hearing-impaired listeners fail to benefit from masker fluctuations?JOSHUA G. W. BERNSTEIN56.Across-fiber coding of temporal fine-structure: Effects of noise-induced hearing loss on auditory-nerve responses.MICHAEL G. HEINZ, JAYAGANESH SWAMINATHAN, JONATHAN D. BOLEY, SUSHRUT KALE57.Beyond the audiogram: identifying and modelling patterns of hearing deficits.RAY MEDDIS, WENDY LECLUYSE, CHRISTINE M. TAN, MANASA R. PANDA, ROBERT T. FERRY

System (Springer Handbook of Auditory Research). His current research concerns the application of computer models to an understanding of hearing impairment. He is a fellow of the Acoustical Society of America and a member of the Association of Research in Otolaryngololgy. Fellowship at the University of Sussex before taking a program leader position at the Medical Research Council Institute for Hearing Research in 1986. He heads a research team that uses neurophysiological, computational and neuroanatomical techniques to study the way the brain processes sound.

Ray Meddis, Ph.D. is director of the Hearing Research Laboratory at the University of Essex, England. His research has concentrated on the development of computer models of the physiology of the auditory periphery and how these can be incorporated into models of psychophysical phenomena such as pitch and auditory scene analysis. He has published extensively in this area. He is co-editor of the book Computational Models of the Auditory System (Springer Ha