Machine Learning Control - Taming Nonlinear Dynamics and Turbulence

Preface.- 1 Introduction.- 1.1 Feedback in engineering and living systems.- 1.2 Benefits of feedback control.- 1.3 Challenges of feedback control.- 1.4 Feedback turbulence control is a grand challenge problem.- 1.5 Nature teaches us the control design.- 1.6 Outline of the book.- 1.7 Exercises.- 2 Machine learning control (MLC).- 2.1 Methods of machine learning.- 2.2 MLC with genetic programming.- 2.3 Examples.- 2.4 Exercises.- 2.5 Suggested reading.- 2.6 Interview with Professor Marc Schoenauer.- 3 Methods of linear control theory.- 3.1 Linear systems.- 3.2 Full-state feedback.- Linear quadratic regulator (LQR).- 3.3 Sensor-based state estimation.- Kalman filtering.- 3.4 Sensor-based feedback.- Linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG).- 3.5 System Identification and Model Reduction.- 3.6 Exercises.- 3.7 Suggested reading.- 4 Benchmarking MLC against linear control.- 4.1 Comparison of MLC with LQR on a linear oscillator.- 4.2 Comparison of MLC with Kalman filter on a noisy linear oscillator.- 4.3 Comparison of MLC with LQG for sensor-based feedback.- 4.4 Modifications for small nonlinearity.- 4.5 Exercises.- 4.6 Interview with Professor Shervin Bagheri.- 5 Taming nonlinear dynamics with MLC.- 5.1 Generalized mean-field system.- 5.2 Machine learning control.- 5.3 Derivation outline for the generalized mean-field model.- 5.4 Alternative control approaches.- 5.5 Exercises.- 5.6 Suggested reading.- 5.7 Interview with Professor Mark N. Glauser.- 6 Taming real world flow control experiments with MLC.- 6.1 Separation control over a backward-facing step.- 6.2 Separation control of turbulent boundary layers.- 6.3 Control of mixing layer growth.- 6.4 Alternative model-based control approaches.- 6.5 Implementation of MLC in experiments.- 6.6 Suggested reading.- 6.7 Interview with Professor David Williams.- 7 MLC tactics and strategy.- 7.1 The ideal flow control experiment.- 7.2 Desiderata of the control problem - from the definition to hardware choices.- 7.3 Time scales of MLC.- 7.4

Thomas Duriez is a tenured French researcher at CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina. He works on experimental, numerical and theoretical aspects of fluid mechanics focusing on flow control. He is part of the pioneer team developing Machine Learning Control for laminar and turbulent flows. He studied at ESPCI-ParisTech, the Paul Sabatier University and IMFT (Toulouse). After his PhD thesis at PMMH (Paris) on the control of separated flows, he had several postdoctoral appointments in academia and industry, including PMMH (Paris),  LFD, LIMSI (Orsay, France) and PPRIME Institute (Poitiers, France) as part of the TUCOROM team. In Poitiers, he developed Machine Learning Control under the leadership of Bernd Noack.




Steven L. Brunton is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering and an Adjunct Assistant Professor in Applied Mathematics at the University of Washington in Seattle. Hegraduated with a B.S. in Mathematics from the California Institute of Technology and received his PhD in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering from Princeton University. Currently, his research interests include data-driven modeling and control of complex dynamical systems using machine learning, compressed sensing, uncertainty quantification, and equation-free modeling; Flow control of unsteady aerodynamics, transport phenomena, and turbulent mixing enhancement; Adaptive and robust control techniques for energy optimization and conversion.  He is a Data Science Fellow with the eScience Institute at UW. 




Bernd R. Noack is Director of Research CNRS at LIMSI-CNRS, Paris-Saclay, and Professor and Chair of 'Flow Modeling and Control' at TU Braunschweig, Germany. Prof. Noack develops closed-loop flow control solutions for cars, airplanes and transport systems in an interdisciplinary effort with an international network of leading researchers. He received a degree as diplom physicist and his physics doctorate from the