The International Criminal Court, the Security Council and Darfur: A Critique
(Sprache: Englisch)
This book considers the relationship between the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) under three major aspects: triggering the jurisdiction of the Court when the Security Council adopts a resolution requesting...
Voraussichtlich lieferbar in 3 Tag(en)
versandkostenfrei
Buch (Kartoniert)
39.99 €
- Lastschrift, Kreditkarte, Paypal, Rechnung
- Kostenlose Rücksendung
Produktdetails
Produktinformationen zu „The International Criminal Court, the Security Council and Darfur: A Critique “
Klappentext zu „The International Criminal Court, the Security Council and Darfur: A Critique “
This book considers the relationship between the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) under three major aspects: triggering the jurisdiction of the Court when the Security Council adopts a resolution requesting that under Article 13 (b) of the Rome Statute; delaying the Court's action by UNSC according to Article 16 of the Rome Statute; and the cooperation between the two institutions in cases where the Council refers to the Court situations, and also with regard to state-party referrals, and situations initiated proprio motu by the Prosecutor.The book analyzes this relationship according to Resolution 1593 (2005) by which the Security Council assigned the situation in Darfur to the Court. It highlights the main flaws of this Resolution, and discusses the African Union's position towards the Court.
Lese-Probe zu „The International Criminal Court, the Security Council and Darfur: A Critique “
Text Sample:Chapter 2:
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE ICC AND UNSC:
In light of the Rome Statute, the relationship between the Court and the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) is characterized by three aspects; referral of a situation by the Security Council to the ICC, deferral of an ICC investigation or prosecution for a renewable period of one year, and the cooperation between the two institution in the situations that referred to the Court by the Council, or by a State party, or initiated proprio motu by the Prosecutor.
The relationship between the ICC and the UNSC has been a subject of debate since the Diplomatic Conference of Plenipotentiaries on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court (Rome, 15 June - 1 7 July 1998). Opinions are still vary on this issue. There are those who believe the relationship between the ICC and the UNSC, as described in Rome Statute, is not something new, but rather is an application to the Council's authority as defined in Chapter VII of the Charter which gives it the mandate "to take whatever steps it deems appropriate in the event of a breach of, or threat to, international peace and security". There are also some who think that this relationship would lead to the politicization of the ICC and undermining of ist independence, in the sense that "to allow the selection of cases to be so dependent on issues of collective security, and to be overseen by a political body concerned with it, is at odds with the fundamental goal and unique focus of all criminal courts to adjudicate the culpability of individual suspects".
The Security Council is the most powerful organs of the United Nations. It composed of five permanent members (China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States) and ten non-permanent members with two-year terms elected by the General Assembly. The Council is charged by the member states with "primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security". Under Article
... mehr
27 of the UN Charter, Security Council decisions on all substantive matters require the affirmative votes of nine members: as a consequence a negative vote (or 'veto') by a permanent member prevents adoption of a proposal, even if it has received the required number of affirmative votes.
Chapter VII of the Charter allows the Council to "determine the existence of any threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression" and to take peaceful and military actions "to maintain or restore international peace and security".
The UNSC, under ist Chapter VII powers, established the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) in 1993 and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) in 1994. As these tribunals were created according to Chapter VII of the UN Charter, member states are obliged, under Article 25 of the Charter, to accept and carry out the decisions of the Council. The UNSC's "authority under the Charter to act in this way was upheld in early rulings of the international tribunals, and would now appear to be beyond dispute".
2.1. Referring a situation to ICC:
Article 13 (b) of the ICC Statute provides that "the Court may exercise ist jurisdiction with respect to a crime referred to in article 5 in accordance with the provisions of this Statute if a situation in which one or more of such crimes appears to have been committed, is referred to the Prosecutor by the Security Council acting under Chapter VII." It is quite clear that, under this article, the UNSC has the right to refer a situation to the court.
There are some noteworthy issues arising from a referral by the UNSC:
When a situation referred to the Court by the Security Council acting pursuant to article 13(b) of the statue, the court would have jurisdiction over it whether the accused is a national of state party or not, or whether the alleged crimes committed on the territory of a State Party of the Rome Statute or not, or whether the state declared ist acce
Chapter VII of the Charter allows the Council to "determine the existence of any threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression" and to take peaceful and military actions "to maintain or restore international peace and security".
The UNSC, under ist Chapter VII powers, established the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) in 1993 and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) in 1994. As these tribunals were created according to Chapter VII of the UN Charter, member states are obliged, under Article 25 of the Charter, to accept and carry out the decisions of the Council. The UNSC's "authority under the Charter to act in this way was upheld in early rulings of the international tribunals, and would now appear to be beyond dispute".
2.1. Referring a situation to ICC:
Article 13 (b) of the ICC Statute provides that "the Court may exercise ist jurisdiction with respect to a crime referred to in article 5 in accordance with the provisions of this Statute if a situation in which one or more of such crimes appears to have been committed, is referred to the Prosecutor by the Security Council acting under Chapter VII." It is quite clear that, under this article, the UNSC has the right to refer a situation to the court.
There are some noteworthy issues arising from a referral by the UNSC:
When a situation referred to the Court by the Security Council acting pursuant to article 13(b) of the statue, the court would have jurisdiction over it whether the accused is a national of state party or not, or whether the alleged crimes committed on the territory of a State Party of the Rome Statute or not, or whether the state declared ist acce
... weniger
Autoren-Porträt von Ammar Mahmoud
Ammar Mahmoud is a Sudanese diplomat, currently working at the Department of International Law and Treaties of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sudan. He previously served in Sudan's diplomatic missions in Jeddah, Abuja and Nairobi.Mr. Mahmoud graduated from the University of Khartoum in 2002 with a B.Sc. in Political Science and a Postgraduate Diploma in International Relations in 2007. Additionally, he obtained a Master of Laws Degree (LL.M) in International Crime and Justice from the University of Turin/ UNICRI in Italy in 2012.
Bibliographische Angaben
- Autor: Ammar Mahmoud
- 2017, 76 Seiten, Maße: 15,5 x 22 cm, Kartoniert (TB), Englisch
- Verlag: Anchor Academic Publishing
- ISBN-10: 3960671792
- ISBN-13: 9783960671794
- Erscheinungsdatum: 01.09.2017
Sprache:
Englisch
Kommentar zu "The International Criminal Court, the Security Council and Darfur: A Critique"
0 Gebrauchte Artikel zu „The International Criminal Court, the Security Council and Darfur: A Critique“
Zustand | Preis | Porto | Zahlung | Verkäufer | Rating |
---|
Schreiben Sie einen Kommentar zu "The International Criminal Court, the Security Council and Darfur: A Critique".
Kommentar verfassen