Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation

Preface and acknowledgements; J. Anthony Blair.- Introduction: Christopher W. Tindale.- Part 1: Critical Thinking.- Introduction.- 1. Is there an obligation to reason well?.- 2. The Keegstra affair: A test case for critical thinking.- 3. What is bias?.- Postscript.- Part 2: Informal Logic.- Introduction.- 4. Argument management, informal logic and critical thinking.- 5. What is the right amount of support for a conclusion.- 6. Premissary relevance.- 7. Premise adequacy.- 8. Relevance, acceptability and sufficiency today.- 9. The 'logic' of informal logic.- 10. Informal logic and logic.- Postscript.- Part 3: Argument Theory.- Introduction.- 11. Walton's argument schemes for presumptive reasoning.- 12. A theory of normative reasoning schemes.- 13. Towards a philosophy of argument.- 14. Argument and its uses.- 15. A time for argument theory integration.- 16. The possibility and actuality of visual arguments.- Postscript.- Part 4: Logic, Dialectic and Rhetoric.- Introduction.- 17. The limits of the dialogue model of argument.- 18. Relationships among logic, dialectic and rhetoric.- 19. The rhetoric of visual arguments.- 20. Pragma-Dialectics and pragma-dialectics.- 21. Investigations and the Critical Discussion model.- 22. Perelman today on justice and argumentation.- 23. Rhetoric and argumentation.- Postscript.- Publications of J. Anthony Blair to June 2011.- References.- Index of Names.- Subject Index.

Christopher W. Tindale, geboren 1953. Er studierte in Kanada und promovierte 1986 im Fach Philosophie an der Waterloo University, Ontario. Nach einer Tätigkeit als Mitglied des Instituts für Philosophie und Altphilologie an der Trent University wechselte er 2006 als Professor für Philosophie und als Direktor des Centre for Research in Reasoning, Argumentation, and Rhetoric (CRRAR) an die University of Windsor, Ontario. Forschungsschwerpunkte: Argumentation, griechische Philosophie der Antike