John Locke and Natural Philosophy

appropriate ... John Locke and Natural Philosophy is an important contribution to Locke studies, and one that ought to be read by anyone with a serious interest in Locke's thought. Many books on Locke can safely be neglected: this is emphatically not one of them. J. R. Milton, Intellectual History Review Anstey uses his vast knowledge of Lockes natural philosophy to argue for four main claims. First, Locke gave experimental natural philosophy higher epistemic status than speculative systems ... Second, Locke thought that constructing Baconian natural histories was the best way to do experimental natural philosophy. Third, Locke did speculate, especially about corpuscularianism, chymistry, and chymical medicine. Fourth, by the 1690s, Locke gave the Newtonian, mathematical method a key role in natural philosophy... All four conclusions are well defended... Anstey has done a great service to the field by writing this book and everyone in the field should read it. Antonia LoLordo, Journal of the History of Philosophy ...a masterful and well-argued study of Locke's philosophy of science that shall become both the standard and starting place, for scholars and students alike, for decades to come. Anstey's meticulous and thorough research, combined with his comprehensive knowledge of the history of natural philosophy, make this work a must-read for all who are interested in Locke, early modern philosophy, the history of the philosophy of science, or early modern philosophy of science. His characteristically rigorous analysis and argumentation coupled with his easy and clear prose make this a highly readable and accessible work of scholarship. In short, I highly recommend this book. Jan-Erik Jones, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews Anstey has produced a meticulous work of philosophical scholarship that should be of great interest to serious students of the history of science and indeed to anyone interested in the fundamental concepts structuring our understanding of the natural world. Lola Sharon Davidson, Parergon - Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association for Medieval and Early Modern Studies one of the most interesting and insightful books published recently on Locke. It is a refreshing revision of many of the standard views of Lockes engagement with natural philosophy and its significance for interpreting his Essay Concerning Human Understanding. It is rich and subtle, and I strongly recommend it to everyone interested in Lockes epistemology and late seventeenth-century philosophy of science generally. Peter Anstey presents a systematic reinterpretation of Lockes philosophy of science ... Ansteys project is fascinating, and the conclusions he brings forth are exciting and quite compelling. I see his book as a game changer in the study of Lockes philosophy of science that will set the tone for future research. It is a must-read for Locke scholars and historians of the philosophy of science alike. Benjamin Hill, Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science