Justice in Funding Adaptation under the International Climate Change Regime

- Acknowledgments
1. Introduction
1.1 Justice and climate change
1.2 Aims of the book
1.3 Outline of the book
2 Adaptation to climate change
2.1 The prominent role of mitigation
2.2 Integrating mitigation and adaptation
2.3 The importance of adaptation
2.4 The notion of adaptation
2.5 Vulnerability
2.6 Adaptive capacity
2.7 Adaptation in practice
3 The ethical bases of international adaptation funding
3.1 From justice to theories of justice
3.2 The scope of distributive justice
3.3 The international span of justice
3.4 The state's responsibility in the liberal perspective
3.5 The sate's social vulnerability in the liberal perspective
3.6 Other justifications of the statist perspective
3.7 The extension of liberal theories of justice to adaptation funding
4 The framework of justice
4.1 Fair process involving all relevant parties
4.2 Responsibility for climate impacts as an ethical basis for raising funds
4.3 Social vulnerability to climate impacts as an ethical reference for allocating funds
4.4 Liberalism and the environment
4.5 Fair adaptation funding: inclusion, specification and commitment
4.6 Sharing the burden of adaptation: differentiated historical responsibility
4.7 Allocating raised adaptation funds: lack of human security
5 The international institutions and instruments governing adaptation funding
5.1 Funding adaptation: rationale
5.2 Funding adaptation: options
5.3 Funding adaptation in the Convention and Kyoto Protocol
5.4 The GEF
5.5 The sources of funding
5.6 Problems and challenges of adaptation funding under the UNFCCC regime
5.7 Funding adaptation outside the UNFCCC regime: significant practices
6 Evaluation of procedural justice in international adaptation funding
6.1 Principal documents: Convention and Kyoto Protocol
6.2 Other principal documents
6.3 Governance structures, procedures and practices
6.4 UNFCCC Institutions
6.5 The GEF
6.6 The importance ofthe Adaptation Fund and its governance