Voting Paradoxes and Group Coherence
The Condorcet Efficiency of Voting Rules
(Sprache: Englisch)
This book argues that strange election outcomes should become less likely as voters' preferences become more mutually coherent. It also focuses on the Condorcet Criterion, which states that pairwise majority rule winner should be chosen as the election winner.
Voraussichtlich lieferbar in 3 Tag(en)
versandkostenfrei
Buch (Kartoniert)
139.09 €
69 DeutschlandCard Punkte
sammeln
- Lastschrift, Kreditkarte, Paypal, Rechnung
- Kostenlose Rücksendung
- Ratenzahlung möglich
Produktdetails
Produktinformationen zu „Voting Paradoxes and Group Coherence “
This book argues that strange election outcomes should become less likely as voters' preferences become more mutually coherent. It also focuses on the Condorcet Criterion, which states that pairwise majority rule winner should be chosen as the election winner.
Klappentext zu „Voting Paradoxes and Group Coherence “
The likelihood of observing Condorcet's Paradox is known to be very low for elections with a small number of candidates if voters' preferences on candidates reflect any significant degree of a number of different measures of mutual coherence. This reinforces the intuitive notion that strange election outcomes should become less likely as voters' preferences become more mutually coherent. Similar analysis is used here to indicate that this notion is valid for most, but not all, other voting paradoxes. This study also focuses on the Condorcet Criterion, which states that the pairwise majority rule winner should be chosen as the election winner, if one exists. Representations for the Condorcet Efficiency of the most common voting rules are obtained here as a function of various measures of the degree of mutual coherence of voters' preferences. An analysis of the Condorcet Efficiency representations that are obtained yields strong support for using Borda Rule.
Inhaltsverzeichnis zu „Voting Paradoxes and Group Coherence “
Voting Paradoxes and Their Probabilities.- Condorcet's Paradox and Group Coherence.- Other Incompability Paradoxes.- Other Voting Paradoxes.- Condorcet Efficiency and Social Homogeneity.- Coherence and the Efficiency Hypothesis.- Other Characteristics of Voting Rules.- The Significance of Voting Rule Selection.- Complete PMR Ranking Efficiencies.
Bibliographische Angaben
- Autoren: William V. Gehrlein , Dominique Lepelley
- 2013, XII, 385 Seiten, Maße: 15,9 x 23,6 cm, Kartoniert (TB), Englisch
- Verlag: Springer, Berlin
- ISBN-10: 364226610X
- ISBN-13: 9783642266102
Sprache:
Englisch
Pressezitat
From the reviews:"This book bridges the gap between the theoretical literature showing the possibility of counterintuitive results and the empirical findings of many experiments in which these counterintuitive results hardly or not at all appear. This is a very well written book, extremely rich in information, integrating many existing and new results and with an impressive number of references to the literature. It is an important and relevant step forward in the Theory of Social Choice, highly recommended to anyone interested in this field." (H. C. M. de Swart, Zentralblatt MATH, Vol. 1252, 2012)
Kommentar zu "Voting Paradoxes and Group Coherence"
0 Gebrauchte Artikel zu „Voting Paradoxes and Group Coherence“
| Zustand | Preis | Porto | Zahlung | Verkäufer | Rating |
|---|
Schreiben Sie einen Kommentar zu "Voting Paradoxes and Group Coherence".
Kommentar verfassen